Your Reasonable Service (Exposition of Romans 12:1-2)

The first 11 chapters of the book of Romans mine the depths of God’s gracious purpose and plan for the redemption of sinful humans. What is our response to be to what God has done for us through Christ? The response of 11:33-36 is doxology – worship of God for His greatness. In 12:1-2, the apostle Paul makes a transition from the first 11 chapters emphasis on doctrine to the final 5 chapters emphasis on practice.

This is Paul’s pattern in several of his letters. He first teaches what God has done for us through Christ. He then tells us what we should do in response to what God has done. This is the pattern in Galatians, where after four chapters explaining our freedom in Christ because we have been justified by faith alone, Paul states in Galatians 5:1,

Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.

The same is true in Ephesians, where Paul has articulated our glorious position in Christ in the first 3 chapters, then in Ephesians 4:1 Paul states:

I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called,

Paul follows the same pattern in his letter to the Romans. After spending 11 chapters magnifying God’s gracious purpose in salvation, he begins in 12:1-2 to call us to live in response to that gracious purpose. This, he says, is our reasonable service.

I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

I. The Basis of Your Service: The Mercies of God, v. 1a.
Paul begins by urging the believers at Rome to present their bodies as living sacrifices to God. This, he says, is their “reasonable service.” But what kind of service is this? And, what makes it so reasonable? The answer to the first question is that the word translated “service” in verse 1 is word related to the service of worship performed at the Old Testament Tabernacle. It is a reference here to the specific act of worship of offering a sacrifice to God. But here, instead of offering an animal, we are told that we should offer our own bodies as a sacrifice to God! Now to the second question, what makes this service so reasonable (since it is called our “reasonable service”)? It is reasonable in light of the mercies of God! In this verse Paul outlines for us the basis of our “reasonable service” to God. The basis is “the mercies of God” by which he beseeches us to present our bodies as living sacrifices.

To what mercies is Paul referring? The answer is seen by Paul’s use of the word “therefore”. Although it is only a conjunction, it serves a very important point in this text. It connects the practical appeals of Romans 12:1 and following with the theological arguments of Romans chapters 1-11. It is on the basis of God’s mercies that we are to present our bodies as living sacrifices. These mercies are the mercies which Paul has expounded over the last 11 chapters. They are the mercies of forgiveness of sins, justification by faith, peace with God, union with Christ, freedom from sin and the law, adoption as sons, possession of the Spirit, election to salvation, no separation from Christ’s love, inclusion of the Gentiles and the future salvation of Israel. In light of all these mercies, Paul urges us to present our bodies as living sacrifices to God.

There is an important lesson to be learned here. Much of today’s preaching places an emphasis on the “how to’s” of Christianity, without an equivalent emphasis on the theology that forms the basis for the practical aspects of Christianity. This is getting the cart before the horse with disastrous results. This is trying to preach Romans 12, before Romans 1-11. The gospel of grace is thereby distorted into a message of moralism and perverted into a religion of legalism. The end result is that God’s truth is not honored, nor are Christians enabled to live the Christian life. Instead, we must first see the glories of God’s grace, before we can properly do our duties as Christians. It is only when the child of God meditates on the manifold mercies of God that he will be enabled by God’s grace to live the Christian life in a practical, God-honoring manner. This is what I mean when I say that the mercies of God are the basis for our service to God!

II. The Nature of Your Service: Total Surrender, v. 1b.
But how is this “reasonable service” based on the mercies of God described? It is described in what must have been shocking terms to the first century reader. The language used by the apostle here is the language of the sacrificial system. Those of us living in the 21st century, who have never had the experience of taking an animal to be thrown on a flaming altar as a sacrifice, can hardly appreciate the significance of what Paul is saying here. He is not saying that we must bring a sacrifice, but that we ourselves must be a sacrifice!

Excursus: But you may say, “I thought all sacrifices ended with the death of Christ on the cross. Was not God satisfied with the one sacrifice for sin forever.” You’re exactly right all sacrifices ended with the death of Christ on the cross! He was, in the words of the author of Hebrews, the “one sacrifice for sin forever”! All sacrifices for sins involving the death of an animal have ended with the death of Christ on the cross. There are, however, sacrifices in the New Covenant. 1 Peter 2:5 states,

You also, as living stones, are being built up a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.

And as Hebrews 13:15 declares,

Therefore by Him let us continually offer the sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of our lips, giving thanks to His name.

Here, in Romans 12:1, Paul clarifies that he is not talking about a sacrifice that deals with satisfying sin’s penalty by designating this sacrifice as a “living sacrifice,” not one involving death.

What then is Paul saying? He is simply saying that we are to offer all we are as a continual living sacrifice to Him. In other words, God doesn’t just want your heart, He wants all of you! This is the meaning of the “body” in this passage. It is a reference to the totality of our being. It is a “living” sacrifice (which distinguishes it from the OT sacrifices), a “holy” sacrifice (which indicates that like the OT sacrifices it is set apart to God), and it is an “acceptable” sacrifice (which indicates that it is well-pleasing to God). Isaac Watts well expressed this idea in the words to When I Survey the Wondrous Cross when he wrote,

Were the whole realm of nature mine,
That were a present far too small;
Love so amazing, so divine,
Demands my soul, my life, my all.

III. The Means of Your Service: Renewal of the Mind, v. 2a.
But what does all this language of sacrifice mean? What does Paul mean when he says that we must surrender the whole of our being to God? I believe the first half of verse 2 explains what Paul means by the second half of verse 1. In other words, the means of total surrender is having a renewed mind. Therefore, the surrendering of our whole lives to God begins on the inside (in the way we think) and works its way to the outside (in what we do).

This renewing of the mind involves both a negative and a positive aspect. The negative aspect is that we are not to be “conformed to this world” The positive aspect is that we ware to be “transformed by the renewing of [our mind.” The word “conform” has the idea of being pressed into a mold, an outward conformity to an external form. But the word “transform” has the idea of changing the inward reality.

What is shaping you? The present evil age (which is what the word “world” refers to in this passage) has the ability to “conform” you to its image. Are you mindlessly drinking in from the fount of the world? What kinds of things do you meditate on?

The Word of God has the ability to “transform” you from the inside out. Are you constantly exposing yourself to its teaching. This is the means of total surrender to God: renewal of the mind. Is your mind being renewed by the power of God’s Word on a regular basis?

You are conformed to the world by what you uncritically digest from the world. You are transformed by the renewing of your mind by what you meditatively digest from the Word. Are you reading God’s Word daily? Are you memorizing God’s Word? Are you meditating on God’s Word? Are you reading authors whose writings are permeated by the Word of God? How else do you expect to have your mind renewed?

In this passage, Paul expects that believers will present the whole of their beings to God as a sacrifice to Him based upon His abundant mercies toward them. How much time do you spend meditating on God’s mercies as revealed in His Word? This is both the basis and the means for our service to God! You tell me how you’re spending your time and I’ll tell you what you are being shaped into!

So, find a way of Bible Intake (reading or hearing the Word of God). Commit to Memorization of and Meditation on the Word of God. Then allow the Word of God to make a difference in the way that you think! It’s not enough just to hear and read the Word of God if it doesn’t change our minds!

Let me ask you a question, does your mind ever get changed because of your reading and studying of God’s Word? Or do you merely find confirmation for what you’ve always believed? We must allow the Word to change us as we encounter areas where we are wrong!

IV. The Result of Your Service: Discernment of God’s Will, v. 2b.
What will the end result be of this kind of service to God? The end result will be a mature discernment of God’s will. The word “prove” has the idea of testing and approving. The Christian who commits the whole of His being to God as a sacrificial offering, based on the mercies of God, by renewing His mind through meditation upon God’s Word will gain an increasing ability to recognize God’s will (that which is good; acceptable, i.e. well-pleasing; and perfect). These three adjectives for the will of God: “good”, “acceptable” and “perfect” are not three different levels of God’s will. The will of God is all three of these things at the same time.
This is a level of Christian maturity that few of us (if any) have attained.

According to Ephesians 5:10, believers are to be “Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord.” Romans 12:1-2 tells us how to do this. This has nothing to do with how to find God’s will for your individual life as in: “Who should I marry?, What job should I have?, etc.” Instead it has to do with God’s moral will, i.e., what is pleasing to Him. The believer whose mind is being renewed by God’s Word will be able to identify God’s will in the moral issues of life.

Conclusion:
Do you want to be able to discern what is pleasing to God? The Christian’s response is yes. Then, put yourself in the offering plate by changing the way you think through the Word of God. Then, and only then, will you have the ability to discern the will of God properly.

Dr. Jerry Vines Last Sunday as Pastor of FBC, Jax

Dr. Jerry Vines, who has served the First Baptist Church of Jacksonville, FL as pastor since 1982, will preach his last sermon as pastor this coming Sunday morning, January 29th. He has served as an excellent model of expository preaching throughout his ministry at FBC, Jacksonville, having preached series in each book of the Bible during his 20 plus years there. His book, Power in the Pulpit is an excellent textbook on the preparation and delivery of expository sermons. Dr. Vines plans to use his remaining years preaching in churches and conference, as well as writing a book defending the Genesis account of Creation.
  • You can read today’s Baptist Press story about Dr. Vines’ last Sunday by clicking here.
  • Another interesting story is this one by Jacksonville’s business and legal newspaper, The Daily Record. You can read their story by clicking here.
  • Finally, this story from the Florida Baptist Witness about Vine’s retirement announcement last year describes Vine’s post-pastorate plans. You can access this story by clicking here.

I would like to express my personal appreciation for Dr. Vines ministry and the impact that he has had on my ministry through his books and preaching!

UPDATE: Dr. Vines was featured on First Coast News this weekend. The story including the video segment that aired on the local news is available by clicking here.

Bibliography for Preaching through Romans

I am currently preaching through the book of Romans at the church I pastor in East Tennessee. I have just finished the eleventh chapter and thought it might be a good idea to list some of the resources that I think have been the most helpful to me as I study this glorious book. By the way, I got this idea from Scott Lamb’s post over at Wisdom of the Pages on “Top 5 Lukan Commentaries for Expositional Preaching” (Good list!). So without any further ado, here is my list:
The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT) by Douglas Moo

Romans (ECNT) by Thomas Schreiner

The Epistle to the Romans (PNTC) by Leon Morris

Romans by John Stott

Epistle to the Romans by John Calvin

Any other recommendations?

From Theology to Doxology (Exposition of Romans 11:33-36)

I remember about 12 years ago that I was traveling on Northshore Rd. just off between Martel Rd. and the brand new 140 that connected Oak Ridge and Alcoa, TN. As I drove it was raining and I was listening to a new cassette tape in my car. It was a album by Steve Green titled “The Mission” and the specific song that I remember listening to as I drove on Northshore with water in the lakes on both sides of the road and falling from the sky in an afternoon shower was called “The Symphony of Praise.” This was the moment in my life when theology (the study of God) became doxology (the worship of God).

God was working in my life at that time in a number of ways. It was around this time in my life that I was reading The Holiness of God and Chosen by God by R.C. Sproul, Ashamed of the Gospel and Reckless Faith by John MacArthur, and The Pleasures of God by John Piper. And I was listening to God-centered music with lyrics like these:

The composer and conductor of the universe
Steps before the orchestra of God
Creation lifts their finely crafted instruments
As all in heaven wildly applaud

The seasons well rehearsed begin with His downbeat
And on his cue the sun trumpets the dawn
The whirling winds swell in a mighty crescendo
With each commanding sweep of His baton
The oceans pound the shore in march to His cadence
The galaxies all revolve in cosmic rhyme
The fall of raindrops all in wild syncopation
As lightning strikes and thunder claps in time

The symphony of praise
Conducted by the Ancient of Days
May each creation great or small
Lift their voices one and all
In the symphony of praise

Heaven waits in hushed anticipation
The great I AM then turns to mortal men
A massive chorus robed in spotless garments
Offer up their song of praise to Him
The glories of God explode in full orchestration
As all creation joins the thunderous refrain
“Worthy, Worthy
WORTHY IS THE LAMB THAT WAS SLAIN”
Lyrics from http://www.stevegreenministries.org

Finally, here was music that matched the theology that I had been reading. The greatness of God that I was studying in Scripture, I was now hearing sung in praise to God. This was a pivotal moment in my life! The day when theology became doxology.

In Romans 11:33-36, the apostle Paul moves from theology to doxology. Theology is the study of God, doxology is the worship of God! This is where all theology should end up, in praise to God! As Paul seeks to bring to a conclusion the first eleven chapters of doctrine before moving to practical Christian living in the remaining chapters, he can think of no greater note on which to end than that of praise to God!

O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! (34) For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor? (35) Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again? (36) For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.

First, true worship is filled with awe about God’s purpose and plans. As Paul meditates on the focus of chapters 9-11 (God’s redemptive plan in history concerning the inclusion of both Jews and Gentiles in His family), he is moved to a point of awe at the mystery and majesty of God’s plan.

In these chapters Paul has shown that God is faithful to His Word and that He has a saving purpose that will not fail! He has a gracious purpose in election, choosing a remnant of Jews in this age, while blinding the majority. He has a sovereign plan for the inclusion of Gentiles in His saving purposes! Yet, those who reject Christ remain responsible for their unbelief. The gospel is freely offered to all who will “call upon the name of the Lord.” Both Jews and Gentiles are invited to come and all may be saved. There is also in chapter 11 the mystery of God’s continuing plan for the nation of Israel. There is coming a day when the blindness from Israel’s hearts will be removed and they will embrace their Messiah with faith and so “all Israel will be saved.”

When Paul thinks of the lofty truths that he has just communicated to his Roman audience, he is struck with awe! This is a proper response to God and His sovereign purposes. He begins this section with the exclamation, “O!” That might be easy for us to pass over but it used in the Greek to express very strong emotions. Can you sense that Paul has become overcome with emotion as he meditates on the greatness of God and His plan? But he doesn’t stop there . . . “O the depth of the riches . . .” Paul is exhausting human language to express the greatness of God. “Both of the wisdom and knowledge of God.” God’s knowledge is His active involvement in the affairs of men. Not merely knowledge about, but causation. God’s wisdom is the execution of that knowledge in the world.

God’s judgments are unsearchable and His ways are incomprehensible! Here Paul gives praise to God, not just for what he knows but also because of what he doesn’t know! For the apostle Paul, not being able to understand what God is doing was not a reason to abandon the faith. Instead it was a reason for praise. A “god” that we can fully comprehend would not be much of a “god”! As God Himself declares of Himself in Isaiah 55:8-9,

For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. (9) For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

Not only was Paul filled with awe at the greatness of God’s plan, he was also speechless at God’s greatness! In verses 34-35, Paul asks three rhetorical questions in a row. All three have the assumed answer of “No one!” These questions have the effect of silencing all who hear them:

  • Who has known the mind of the Lord? Silence, because the answer is no one!
  • Who has been God’s counsellor? Silence, because the answer is no one!
  • Who has first given to God? Silence, because the answer is no one!

This series of questions serves to shut the mouths of all those who might seek to boast in God’s presence. In verse 34, the apostle uses the language of Isaiah 40:13 (which in its context is dealing with the return of the nation of Israel from the Babylonian captivity). The implication is that no one could have foreseen God’s deliverance of the nation of Israel from their Babylonian captivity. No human could have devised this plan. In a similar way, Paul uses this verse in Romans 11 to highlight that no human could have devised the plan for God to turn again to the nation of Israel in the last days and remove their blindness that they might experience salvation, but this is exactly what God has done.

In verse 35, the question is reminiscent of God’s question to Job in Job 41:11. The question is who gave first to God, tell us and He’ll pay you back! Silence! There in the context of chapters 40-42, God questions Job and Job is reduced to silence! See Job 40:1-10; 41:11; 42:1-6.

This is the response of those who have encountered the greatness of God. They’re not hooping, hollering and running the aisles. They are silenced at His majesty! Some people get nervous if it gets quiet in church. Instead, why don’t you use those moments to meditate on the greatness and majesty of our God!

Finally, in verse 36, Paul was struck by the centrality of God in all things! This is the basis of doxology, God Himself! God is shown here to be the source of all things, the means of all things, and the goal of all things!

  • He is the source of all things: James 1:17
  • He is the means of all things: 1 Chronicles 29:14
  • He is the goal of all things: 1 Corinthians 15:24-28

A little over a year ago, John Piper preached a sermon on the supremacy of Jesus Christ. No one I know living today is a better example of blending theology with doxology than John Piper. In this message he said of Christ:

He is supreme in every admirable way over everything:
  • over galaxies and endless reaches of space;
  • over the earth from the top of Mount Everest 29,000 feet up, to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean 36,000 feet down into the Mariana Trench;
  • He is supreme over all plants and animals, from the peaceful Blue Whale to the microscopic killer viruses;
  • over all weather and movements of the earth: hurricanes, tornadoes, monsoons, earthquakes, avalanches, floods, snow, rain, sleet;
  • over all chemical processes that heal and destroy: cancer, AIDS, malaria, flu, and all the workings of antibiotics and a thousand healing medicines.
  • He is supreme over all countries and all governments and all armies;
  • over Al Qaeda and all terrorists and kidnappings and suicide bombings and beheadings;
  • over bin Ladin and al-Zarqawi;
  • over all nuclear threats from Iran or Russia or North Korea.
  • He is supreme over all politics and elections;
  • over all media and news and entertainment and sports and leisure;
  • and over all education and universities and scholarship and science and research;
  • and over all business and finance and industry and manufacturing and transportation; and over all the internet and information systems.

As Abraham Kuyper used to say, “there is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry, ‘Mine!’”
Sermon manuscript available at: http://www.desiringgod.org/library/sermons/04/092604.html

It’s all His! That’s what Romans 11:36 tells us!

So, what’s our response! We put a hand over our mouth and bow before His majesty! And when we’re finally able to speak, we speak of His greatness!

New Piper Book Reviewed by Derick Dickens

John Piper has a new book coming out (surprised?) on January 23, 2006. It is titled Contending for Our All and is the fourth in a series of books called “The Swans are Not Silent”. These are excellent biographical studies of faithful Christians from Church history. My friend Derick Dickens has reviewed this latest volume on his blog. Here’s the link to the review. You can preorder the book from Amazon.com for $12.23 by clicking here.

George Whitefield on the Doctrine of Election

In the volume 1 of Arnold Dallimore’s 2 volume biography of George Whitefield, Dallimore writes of Whitefield’s belief in the doctrines of God’s grace in election. Below are a few of the striking quotes, that I came across in my reading today:
The doctrines of our election, and free justification in Christ Jesus are daily more and more pressed upon my heart. They fill my soul with a holy fire and afford me great conficence in God my Saviour (Works, p. 79).

I hope we shall catch fire from each other, and that there will be a holy emulation amongst us, who shall most debase man and exalt the Lord Jesus. Nothing but the doctines of the Reformation can do this. All others leave freewill in man and make him, in part at least, a Saviour to himself. My soul, come not thou near the secret of those who teach such things . . . I know Christ is all in all. Man is nothing: he hath a free will to go to hell, but none to go to heaven, till God worketh in him to do of His good pleasure (Works, pp. 89-90).

Oh, the excellency of the doctrine of election and of the saint’s final perseverance! I am persuaded, till a man comes to believe and feel these important truths, he cannot come to himself, but when convinced of these, and assured of their application to his own heart, he then walks by faith indeed! . . . Love, not fear, constrains him to obedience (Works, p. 101).

After giving the above quotes on p. 407 of the first volume of his biography of Whitefield, Dallimore comments that for Whitefield these doctrines of grace “were not separate tenets, to be accepted or rejected one by one, but a series of truths so joined together as to compose a great system of theology” and that “Whitefield looked upon these doctrines as the foundation of a most fervent, soul-winning ministry.”

What is Israel’s Place in Redemptive History? (Exposition of Romans 11:11-32)

In a speech delivered on October 27, 1994 in Jerusalem, the President of the United States quoted the words of his pastor, “If you abandon Israel, God will never forgive you . . . it is God’s will that Israel, the biblical home of the people of Israel, continue for ever and ever.” President Bill Clinton concluded his speech by saying, “Your journey is our journey, and America will stand with you now and always” (cited in O. Palmer Robertson, The Israel of God, 1).

These words assume that Israel’s place in God’s plan is ultimately tied to a tiny strip of land in Palestine. The idea behind these words is a mistaken focus on the modern political state of Israel instead of her spiritual place in the kingdom of God.

Now, let me affirm that God did promise the land to Abraham and his descendants. This land was to belong to the physical descendants of Abraham as long as they remained faithful to God. However, because of their rebellion against God and rejection of the Messiah the nation as a whole has forfeited its divine right to the land. I believe that God will remain faithful to His promises to the believing remnant within Israel. Even Gentiles who place their trust in the Jewish Messiah will also receive the inheritance of the land. The promised land, though, has been expanded to include the entire earth which all believers (Jews and Gentiles) will inherit at the Second Coming.

It’s both very interesting and instructive that in this New Testament passage that most clearly deals with Israel’s place in redemptive history, the land is not mentioned once (contrary to the teaching of many which use this chapter to argue for Israel’s divine right to the land of Palestine). On the other hand, instead of physical blessings, the spiritual blessings of “life from the dead”, “salvation” and “mercy” are clearly the focus of this text.

So, what is Israel’s place in redemptive history? In Romans 11:11-32, the apostle Paul first states, then illustrates and finally explains Israel’s place in redemptive history.

So I ask, did they stumble in order that they might fall? By no means! Rather through their trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles, so as to make Israel jealous. (12) Now if their trespass means riches for the world, and if their failure means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean! (13) Now I am speaking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch then as I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry (14) in order somehow to make my fellow Jews jealous, and thus save some of them. (15) For if their rejection means the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance mean but life from the dead? (16) If the dough offered as firstfruits is holy, so is the whole lump, and if the root is holy, so are the branches. (17) But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, although a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing root of the olive tree, (18) do not be arrogant toward the branches. If you are, remember it is not you who support the root, but the root that supports you. (19) Then you will say, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” (20) That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast through faith. So do not become proud, but stand in awe. (21) For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you. (22) Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness. Otherwise you too will be cut off. (23) And even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again. (24) For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, the natural branches, be grafted back into their own olive tree. (25) Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. (26) And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”; (27) “and this will be my covenant with them when I take away their sins.” (28) As regards the gospel, they are enemies of God for your sake. But as regards election, they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. (29) For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. (30) Just as you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, (31) so they too have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may now receive mercy. (32) For God has consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all.

There are three major sections in this text of Scripture. In each of these three sections, similar themes are highlighed. First in verses 11-15, Paul states Israel’s place in redemptive history. Next in verses 16-24, Paul illustrates Israel’s place in redemptive history. Finally in verses 25-32, Paul further explains Israel’s place in redemptive history and its great significance.

I. Israel’s Place in Redemptive History Stated, vv. 11-15.
First, in this section, the apostle Paul states Israel’s place in redemptive history in a very straight-forward manner. Paul skips the role of Israel before the coming of Christ which is well-known. He instead begins by focusing on the issue that everyone then wanted (and now wants) to know” What is Israel’s place now, in light of her apparent rejection of the Messiah? Paul has shown in the previous two chapters that, although Israel is responsible for her unbelief (chapter 10), God had a sovereign plan to harden many while electing to save only a remnant of believing Jews out of ethnic Israel in this present age (chapter 9). Here in chapter 11, Paul explains God’s purpose in His sovereign plan. It is a story in four parts, each of which are essentially repeated in each of the three major sections of this morning’s text.

  • First, the fall of Jews in unbelief is described.
  • Second, the salvation of the Gentiles comes as a result of the fall of Jews.
  • Third, Jews are provoked to jealousy by the mercy shown to Gentiles.
  • Fourth, this jealousy results in the salvation of the Jews.

In this four part story of Israel’s place in redemptive history, God always acts in the most unexpected manner. The reason God acts in this way is to magnify His goodness, mercy and sovereignty.

All of this explanation comes in response to the question posed by Paul in verse 11, “Have they stumbled that they should fall?” In other words, is Israel’s stumbling (described in Romans 9:32-33 and 11:9) final and complete? Paul’s answer is with the strong negative: “God forbid!” Israel’s stumbling is not God’s final word regarding the Jewish people. They still have a place in His plan of redemptive history.

In these verses Paul builds an argument from the lesser to the greater indicating that the future is indeed bright for the people of Israel. This argument highlights the great blessings that have come to the Gentile world through the Jewish rejection of the Messiah. In verse 11, Paul uses this argument when he asks, “If the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?” In verse 15 the argument also takes the form of a question: “if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?” The implication in both of these verses is that a great future awaits Israel in which the Jewish people accept their previously rejected Messiah.

Interestingly, there also seems to be a hint here at when this event will transpire. The phrase in verse 15 seems to indicate that this glorious event will occur near the time when the resurrection of the dead also occurs. This is understood in New Testament thought to be at the end of the age. So the “fullness” of the Jewish people when they “receive” their Messiah will also occur at the end of the age (There’s another hint of this in verses 25-26. See below.).

II. Israel’sPlace in Redemptive History Illustrated, vv. 16-24.
In this section, Paul illustrates Israel’s place in redemptive history by the example of the olive tree. But before he introduces this familiar image for the nation of Israel from the Old Testament, he first introduces another image from the Old Testament in verse 16. This image comes from Numbers 15:17-21 which states:

The LORD spoke to Moses, saying, (18) “Speak to the people of Israel and say to them, When you come into the land to which I bring you (19) and when you eat of the bread of the land, you shall present a contribution to the LORD. (20) Of the first of your dough you shall present a loaf as a contribution; like a contribution from the threshing floor, so shall you present it. (21) Some of the first of your dough you shall give to the LORD as a contribution throughout your generations.

The idea is that since the “firstfruit” is set apart to the Lord, then the whole lump is also consecrated to the Lord. I believe Paul is saying that since the fathers (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) were set apart to the Lord, so also is the remainder of the loaf of Israel.
Paul moves on to stretch the imagery to that of a tree whose roots are of a certain character and therefore, so also are the branches. The roots of the patriarchs were holy, so too are the branches of Israel.

In verses 17-24, Paul expands on this image of the branches of a tree with the illustration of the olive tree. This imagery of the olive tree was first applied to the nation of Israel by the prophet Jeremiah in Jeremiah 11:16-17,

The LORD once called you ‘a green olive tree, beautiful with good fruit.’ But with the roar of a great tempest he will set fire to it, and its branches will be consumed. (17) The LORD of hosts, who planted you, has decreed disaster against you, because of the evil that the house of Israel and the house of Judah have done, provoking me to anger by making offerings to Baal.”

The comparison of Israel to an olive tree is now applied to Israel’s place in redemptive history in a way that corresponds to the story in four parts that we observed in verses 11-15. Some of the natural branches were broken off (fall of Jews), branches from a wild olive tree were grafted in (salvation of Gentiles), warning against boasting (Gentiles can be removed for unbelief, just as unbelieving Jews have been removed), God can graft believing Jews back in (salvation of the Jews).

The process of graffing in branches from a wild olive tree into an existent cultivated tree was an unusual one in the first century. Usually the opposite was done because branches from wild olive trees were notoriously non-fruitbearing. Branches from cultivated olive trees were usually grafted into healthy wild trees to take advantage both of the strength of the wild tree and the fruitfulness of the cultivated tree. Paul says here that God has done what is “contrary to nature” (verse 24). He has taken non-fruitbearing branches from among the Gentiles and graffed them into the Jewish olive tree and made them produce fruit. This only transpires after God has removed the unbelieving Jewish natural branches in judgment. However, Gentiles should not boast in their position in the tree since they are only there by God’s mercy through faith. Just as some of the natural branches have been removed because of unbelief, so too can the wild branches be removed if they are unbelieving. In this illustration we see Israel’s place in redemptive history depicted. The branches that were broken off represent unbelieving Israel. The branches that were allowed to remain represent the remnant of believing Israel. The branches graffed in from the wild olive tree represent Gentile believers. Finally, the future restoration of Jewish branches is held out as a possibility if the Jewish people cease their unbelief and embrace the Messiah!

III. Israel’s Place in Redemptive History Explained, vv. 25-32.
In this final section, Paul explains in more detail Israel’s place in redemptive history. It is explained as a mystery that had been hidden and has now been revealed. The mystery is that the majority of Israel would be hardened throughout the gospel age while multitudes of Gentiles would believe. But, there is an additional aspect to this mystery. At the end of this age, God will once again turn to the nation of Israel and remove their blindness. Then a vast majority of Jews living at that time will believe and “all Israel shall be saved.” Paul quotes from Isaiah 59:20-21 in verses 26 and 27 as evidence of this truth. In this passage a time is prophesied in which all ungodliness will be turned away from Jacob (v. 26b) and God “shall take away their sins” (v. 27). This has not yet happened and therefore a future event is being identified. It is the event that will transpire after “the fullness of the Gentiles be come in” (v. 25). It is the event described in verse 26a as the time when “all Israel shall be saved”! This must refer to the end of the age just before the second coming since all of the elect from among the Gentiles will have placed their faith in Christ. This is the time which was hinted at earlier when this event was linked with the resurrection with the phrase “life from the dead”. This is the climatic event in human history before or at the return of Christ when Israel in mass turns to and embraces their Messiah.

Paul brings the discussion of Israel’s place in redemptive history to a fitting conclusion in verses 28-32. Here the Jews are seen as the enemies of God in the present age in order that God might show mercy to the Gentiles. But elect Israel is beloved on behalf of the patriarchs and therefore God will turn to them again and remove their spiritual blindness at the end of the age.
In this section too, we see the familiar pattern evident in the previous two sections of our text. Israel’s partial blindness has led to the fullness of the Gentiles which in turn will terminate with the salvation of Israel.

Throughout redemptive history God’s mercy has been highlighted. Gentiles, who were previously unbelieving, have now obtained mercy through Israel’s unbelief. In the future, Israel will obtain mercy through the mercy being shown presently to the Gentiles. Both Jews and Gentiles have had their unbelief exposed throughout history in order to magnify God’s mercy which is shown indiscriminately to both Jews and Gentiles who believe.

Conclusion:

God’s purpose in redemptive history has been to conclude both Jews and Gentiles in unbelief in order that He might have mercy on both Jews and Gentiles. Compare Paul’s words in Romans 3:22-23 and 10:12. Both of these verses emphasize that “there is no difference” in God’s eyes between the Jews and Gentiles. The first reference shows this is true in regard to man’s sinfulness. The second shows this is true in regard to the avalability of the gospel.

For there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

Romans 3:22-23

For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Romans 10:12-13

The Return of the Sith . . .Er, the Doxoblogist!

I would like to welcome back my brother to the blogosphere. Things just weren’t the same for the eight days in which he was gone! When you read his latest post, you will see that it has been well worth the wait. It is a spoof of Charlie Daniel’s song The Devil Went Down to Georgia detailing a fictional encounter between John MacArthur and Robert Schuller. ‘Nuff said, check it out!

Book Recommendation: Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God

Packer, J. I. Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. 1961. 126 pp. $11.00.
Introduction

If God has already determined who will be saved, why should I evangelize? This question is the vital one which J. I. Packer seeks to answer in his book Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God. Packer is the Board of Governors Professor of Theology at Regent College in Vancouver. He has written numerous books related to the study of theology, including the bestseller Knowing God (back cover). The main content of this book was originally given as a lecture to the Pre-Mission Conference of the London Inter-Faculty Christian Union on October 24th, 1959. The book in its present form has been expanded to further its usefulness (7).
Summary
Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God, as the title suggests, surveys the topic of evangelism and its relationship to God’s sovereignty. The book consists of four chapters. In chapter one, Packer asserts that all Christians believe in ‘Divine Sovereignty’. In chapter two, Packer explores the antinomy of ‘Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility’. In Chapter three, Packer explains the meaning and practice of ‘Evangelism’. In Chapter four, which is titled ‘Divine Sovereignty and Evangelism’, Packer examines the effect that belief in the sovereignty of God has upon the practice of evangelism.

In chapter one, Packer asserts that all Christians believe in the sovereignty of God. He asserts this, not by arguing for the doctrine theologically, but by stating the practical reality that all Christians pray. “God’s sovereignty is the basis of your prayers” (11). Packer not only asserts that all Christians believe in the sovereignty of God in general. He also insists that all Christians believe in the sovereignty of God in salvation. He knows this for two reasons. First, because “you give God thanks for your conversion” (12) and second, because “you pray for the conversion of others” (15). Thus, all Christians believe in the sovereignty of God, “but some are not aware that they do” (16). As Packer states it, “On our feet we may have arguments about it, but on our knees we are all agreed” (17).

In chapter two, Packer explores the antinomy of divine sovereignty and human responsibility. An antinomy is defined as “an apparent incompatibility between two apparent truths” (18). The antinomy of divine sovereignty and human responsibility exists because they are both “taught us side by side in the same Bible; sometimes, indeed, in the same text” (22). This antinomy creates two great temptations. The first is to disregard the texts which teach divine sovereignty and to have “an exclusive concern with human responsibility” (23). The second is to disregard the texts which teach human responsibility and to have “an exclusive concern with divine sovereignty” (29). Packer’s goal is to “take both doctrines perfectly seriously, as the Bible does, and to view them in their positive biblical relationship” (35). With the conclusion of this chapter, Packer has built a foundation upon which to discuss the topic of evangelism.

In chapter three, Packer explains the meaning and practice of evangelism. This chapter is by far the longest of the four and contains the “proper subject” of the book (9). First, Packer seeks to define evangelism by analyzing the famous definition given by the Archbishops’ Committee in 1918 (37-41) and by examining the apostle Paul’s view of evangelism (42-53). In the end, Packer declares “Wherever, and by whatever means, the gospel is communicated with a view to conversion, there you have evangelism” (57). Second, Packer summarizes the content of the evangelistic message (58-73). It is “the gospel of Christ, and Him crucified; the message of man’s sin and God’s grace, of human guilt and divine forgiveness, of new birth and new life through the gift of the Holy Spirit” (57). Third, Packer lists the two motives which should encourage us to evangelize (73-82). “The first is love to God and concern for His glory; the second is love to man and concern for his welfare” (73). Fourth, Packer discusses the proper means and methods of evangelism (82-91). “In the last analysis,” Packer concludes, “there is only one method of evangelism: namely, the faithful explanation and application of the gospel message” (86).

In chapter four, Packer examines the effect that belief in the sovereignty of God has upon the practice of evangelism. Packer’s conviction is that belief in this doctrine will result in one being able to evangelize better (126). This is so because this doctrine “makes us bold and confident before men, so it makes us humble and importunate before God” (125). Those who question the need to evangelize because of this doctrine need to be reminded “We are to order our lives by the light of His law, not by our guesses about His plan” (96).

Critical Evaluation
Packer’s stated purpose in the book’s introduction is to discuss evangelism “in relationto the sovereignty of God” (9). The abiding popularity of this book, which has been in print for over forty years, is a testimony to the degree of success Packer had in meeting that goal. I believe that Packer has succeeded in showing that belief in the sovereignty of God in salvation and the practice of evangelism are not mutually exclusive to one another. In the following, I will outline the strengths and weaknesses of this book according to my perspective.
Strengths

Packer accomplishes his purpose by establishing the doctrine of the sovereignty of God and its relationship to human responsibility. He then builds upon this foundation to discuss his “proper subject” of evangelism. Finally, Packer shows the beneficial effects of an individual’s belief in the sovereignty of God on one’s practice of evangelism.

Another strength is the masterful way in which Packer establishes that all Christians believe in the sovereignty of God. He does not try and prove the doctrine. He says, “There is no need; for I know that, if you are a Christian, you believe this already” (11). He argues that all Christians pray and “the recognition of God’s sovereignty” is the basis of their prayers. This proves that “whatever side you may have taken in debates on this question in the past, in your heart you believe in the sovereignty of God no less firmly than anyone else (17).

Another strength of the book is Packer’s description of the Scripture’s teaching on divine sovereignty and human responsibility as an antinomy. Packer suggests dealing with antinomies by noting “what connections exist between the two truths and their two frames of reference, and teach yourself to think of reality in a way that provides for their peaceful coexistence, remembering that reality itself has proved actually to contain both” (21). Since Scripture teaches both the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man, we must take them both seriously and “view them in their positive biblical relationship” (35). Their biblical relationship is that of “friends, and they work together” (36).

Another strength of Packer’s book is the way in which he defines the evangelistic message. Packer summarizes the gospel message into four distinct components. The first is that “the gospel is a message about God” (58). The second is that “the gospel is a message about sin” (59). The third is that “the gospel is a message about Christ” (63). And the fourth is that “the gospel is a summons to faith and repentance” (70). These four components provide a helpful summary of the evangelistic message.

A final strength of the book is Packer’s emphasis that the doctrine of God’s sovereignty should serve as a motivation and encouragement to evangelism. After asserting that belief in God’s sovereignty in salvation is not a deterrent to evangelism, Packer argues that God’s sovereignty “gives us our only hope of success in evangelism” (106). Packer elaborates:

the sovereignty of God in grace is the one thing that prevents evangelism from being pointless. For it creates the possibility – indeed, the certainty – that evangelism will be fruitful. Apart from it, there is not even a possibility of evangelism being fruitful. Were it not for the sovereign grace of God, evangelism would be the most futile and useless enterprise that the world has ever seen, and there would be no more complete waste of time under the son than to preach the Christian gospel (106).

The above is true “because of the spiritual inability of man in sin” (106). Therefore, “when we evangelize, our trust must be in God who raises the dead” (117). In the end, Packer acknowledges, “We would not wish to say that man cannot evangelize at all without coming to terms with this doctrine; but we venture to think that, other things being equal, he will be able to evangelize better for believing it” (126).

Weaknesses

One possible weakness is the brevity of the book. Because of its size, neither evangelism nor God’s sovereignty are given adequate space to be developed fully. Packer acknowledges as much in his introduction (9). However, had the book been longer it might not have been read. The importance of this book’s topic required it to be accessible to all who would be interested in either evangelism or the sovereignty of God.

Conclusion

Given the above summary and critical analysis, I believe that Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God is must reading for anyone interested in either the doctrine of divine sovereignty or the practice of evangelism. For those who already value God’s sovereignty in salvation, this book could serve as a needed corrective to those who believe evangelism is unnecessary. On the other hand, for those who see the importance of evangelism, this book could introduce them to a comforting, confidence-giving doctrine which should only energize the evangelism. For me personally, I cannot imagine studying the topic of evangelism without this book serving as the backdrop for every other discussion of evangelism. I do not think anyone should attempt to debate the issues of divine sovereignty and human responsibility without careful consideration of the arguments made by J. I.. Packer in Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God.

A New (Old) Friend

A new friend (from my past) is now blogging at a blog titled Beyond the Stars. I was acquainted with D.J. Cimino’s family over ten years ago. We were recently reacquainted and are in the process of getting to know each other better. D.J.’s new blog looks very promising. Check it out and let him know what you think. Below is a brief description of Beyond the Stars given by D.J. himself from his inaugural post:
“The Christian is the one whose imagination should fly beyond the stars.” Francis A. Schaeffer

Phil. 4:8 Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence
and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things. (NASB)

There are those who retreat from culture and life. There are those that isolate themselves from the world around them, mainly due to a misinformed view of what “separation from the world” actually entails. Because of this Christians are robbed of beautiful art, music, and literature. I hope that through this blog you will be introduced (or re-introduced) to something beautiful. Whether it be music, movies, Theology, books, art, or photography, I hope it will cause your imagination to “fly beyond the stars”.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,020 other followers