University of Tennessee Vols 2006 Football Schedule

After enduring a 5-6 2005 campaign, the University of Tennessee Volunteers Football team have an apparently easier schedule for 2006. At least, we don’t have to worry about scheduling in time to watch them play on New Year’s Day!
  • Sept. 30 – Northwest Jr. High School
  • Oct. 7 – Boy Scout Troop #49
  • Oct. 14 – Shannondale Assisted Living Home
  • Oct. 21 – East Tennessee Blind Academy
  • Oct. 28 – World War II Veterans
  • Nov. 4 – Brownie Scout Troop #14
  • Nov. 11 – Knoxville Communicable Disease Clinic
  • Nov. 18 – Central High School freshmen
  • Nov. 25 – Knoxville Little League Baseball All-Stars
  • Dec. 2 – Johnson City VA Hospital
  • Dec. 9 – Lenoir City Retired Librarian’s Knitting Club

This schedule was sent to me by a friend named Mark Martin, who himself had received it from another friend, Sonny Works. Thanks guys! Go Vols!!!

To see the real 2006 Vols schedule click here.

Merry Christmas from the Weaver Family

Merry Christmas from Steve, Gretta, Haddon, Hannah, Isaac and Jonathan!


The First Christmas Message (Genesis 3:15)

The first Christmas wasn’t celebrated until at least 300 years after the birth of Christ, but the first Christmas message was preached at least four thousand years before the birth of Christ. The first Christmas message ever was preached by God the Creator Himself. The whole human race (Adam and Eve) along with Satan was the congregation. The Garden of Eden was the sanctuary. Where is this first Christmas message recorded? In the 3rd chapter of the Bible, Genesis 3. In this text we see three important aspects of Christ’s birth. The reason for Christ’s birth, the revelation of Christ’s birth and the result of Christ’s birth are each spelled out in Genesis 3:15. This verse occurs in the midst of the curse that is being pronounced by God upon Adam and Eve. After Adam passes the blame to Eve and Eve to the Serpent, God addresses the Serpent for that is who His quarel is with ultimately. This verse has been called by theologians the protoevangelion (first gospel). It was the first Christmas message!
And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

In this verse we first see . . .
I. The Reason for Christ’s Birth.
The birth of Jesus Christ and therefore the Christmas holiday itself would be completely unnecessary were it not for sin. Jesus is the reason for the season. But ultimately sin is the reason for the season. The sin of mankind is the black backdrop against which the glorious first Christmas message was given. We can never understand fully the glory of the Christmas message until we understand the depths of mankind’s sin. As Charles Haddon Spurgeon once said:

Few preachers of religion do believe thoroughly the doctrine of the Fall, or else they think that when Adam fell down he broke his little finger, and did not break his neck and ruin his race.

No, Adam’s fall did ruin the human race and because of our sin we need a Savior!!!

Secondly in this text we see . . .
II. The Revelation of Christ’s Birth.
Here in Genesis 3:15 the unusual circumstances surrounding the birth of Jesus are revealed. He is called “her seed”. The seed of a woman is an unusual way to describe a child. Normally we would think of the seed coming from the male. But this birth was going to be different. Of course this could simply refer to the fact that the Christ would descend from a woman, but later revelation spells out in more detail the implications of this promise that appeared in “seed” form (pun intended) in Genesis 3:15. For example:

Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Isaiah 7:14

If there was any doubt about this prophecy applying to Christ, Matthew clarifies it in Matthew 1:18-25,

Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. (19) Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily. (20) But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost. (21) And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. (22) Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, (23) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. (24) Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: (25) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.

Jesus was born to Mary in Bethlehem over 2,000 years ago as the unique “seed of the woman” who was “born of a virgin” who came as God’s deliverer to defeat the Serpent himself.

Finally in this text we see . . .
III. The Result of Christ’s Birth
God has invaded this planet to join battle against His ancient foe, Satan. That’s what we’re celebrating, not just a baby in a manger. But the King of all creation who humbled Himself and became a helpless baby and grew up to be the man who conquered death, hell and the grave.

Even as a helpless baby, Satan couldn’t stop Him! He tried to destroy Him through Herod, but he was unsuccessful.

Jesus Christ was born on purpose for a purpose and that purpose was to crush Satan’s head! On the cross, Christ destroyed sin, death and Satan! Note the parallels in this verse to the gospel accounts:

The seed of the woman = virgin birth
bruised heel = minor wound (temporary)
bruised head = mortal wound (permanent)

The picture is of a champion taking his heel and grinding the head of the serpent to destroy it. The heel of the champion would be temporarily wounded, but the serpent would be destroyed. This is exactly what Christ did upon Calvary. His heel was wounded, he suffered temporarily upon the cross. But His suffering upon the cross was the means by which the head of Satan was crushed and his works destroyed forever. Read the words afresh of Hebrews 2:14-15 and 1 John 3:8,

Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

Richard Halverson explains why Christ did not just stay alive and eliminate each generations evils and diseases:

Why did Jesus Christ not remain alive and eliminate, generation by generation, all the evils which harass humanity? Simply because He was the Great Physician, and in the finest tradition of medical science, He was unwilling to remain preoccupied with the symptoms when He could destroy the disease. Jesus Christ was unwilling to settle for anything less than elimination of the cause of all evil in history.
Relevance. Christianity Today, Vol. 38, no. 2.

Jesus dealt with the root cause of sin, suffering and death when He defeated Satan on the cross! This is the true reason for the season: the destruction of sin and death by the destruction of the ancient Serpent!

The great modern epics of Star Wars and The Lord of the Rings have nothing on this story. This is the true story of the triumph of good over evil and light over darkness from which all the other stories receive their inspiration. It is indeed “good news”! Merry Christmas!

Why God Became Man (A Christmas Message)

Audio of this sermon as preached on December 14, 2003 is available online by clicking here.

What is Christmas about? Most people will tell you it’s about: Presents and Santa, lights and trees, snow and days off from work and school, some will even say family and church. But it seems that fewer and fewer will actually state the true meaning of Christmas: The birth of Jesus Christ.

A poll by the Barna Research Group in America found that only 37% of adults thought the birth of Jesus is the most important aspect of Christmas. 44% of the respondents said family time is the most important part of the Christmas celebration. 3% said presents or parties were the most important part of Christmas. The same percentage said the best thing about Christmas was getting a paid holiday.

The well known humor column writer, Dave Barry, humorously illustrates this phenomenon by describing the subtle removal of Christ from our school programs. He writes,

To avoid offending anybody, the school dropped religion altogether and started singing about the weather. At my son’s school, they now hold the winter program in February and sing increasingly non-memorable songs such as “Winter Wonderland,” “Frosty the Snowman” and–this is a real song–”Suzy Snowflake,” all of which is pretty funny because we live in Miami. A visitor from another planet would assume that the children belonged to the Church of Meteorology.

If you were to visit earth for the first time, would you realize what we’re supposed to be celebrating. Again, as always it is important to turn to the pages of Scripture for clarification. If we look to Hollywood, we’ll be misguided. If we look to the commercial aspects of Christmas, we’ll be misguided. If we listen to the most popular Christmas songs, we may be misguided. But if we look in God’s Word, we won’t be misguided. And God’s Word tells us that Christmas is about God becoming man, which begs the question: Why Did God Become Man? Fortunately, God did not leave this question unanswered. The answer is clearly stated many times in God’s Word, one of the most accessible is Romans 8:1-4 which is the text to which I would like to invite you to turn now.

There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. (2) For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. (3) For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: (4) That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

1. We have a Problem.
Those are words you don’t want to hear. Whether you’re an astronaut, air traffic controller, or a parent; those words send a chill down your spine in certain circumstances. Our problem is that one word found in verse 1 “condemnation” and its immediate context. Although this verse says there is “now no condemnation in Christ Jesus,” it assumes that those outside of Christ are still in a state of condemnation. The word “condemnation” refers to the punishment which follows sentencing in a judicial court. If the death sentence has been the verdict, the condemnation is the carrying out of that penalty by whatever means of execution used by the court.

You may say, ‘That’s not a problem, everyone sins.” But it is a problem if the Christian God is real. Because the Christian God has revealed Himself as holy, so holy that sinful man cannot exist in His presence. This Holy God is our Creator and as such He deserves our whole-hearted love and worship. If the first and greatest commandment as stated by Jesus is to “love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind” (Matt. 22:37), then the first and greatest sin must be to fail to “love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.” This is our problem. We are rebels against our holy Creator.
The testimony of Scripture is that God is worthy “to receive glory and honour and power” because He “created all things, and for thy (His) pleasure they are and were created” (Rev 4:11).

One thing we don’t need Scripture to tell us is that we’re sinners. If we’re honest with ourselves we know that all too well. For those who are not honest with themselves, God says, “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). And before we take comfort by thinking that everyone sins so it isn’t such a big deal ‘to err is human,’ God adds three chapters later that “The wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23).

Yes we have a problem, a big problem. We are sinners awaiting our condemnation.

2. We have a Big Problem that We Cannot Solve.
But it gets worse. Not only do we have a big problem, but it is a problem that we cannot possibly solve. We don’t like that. Especially men, we want to solve problems. Women want to talk about problems, men want to solve the problem. Maybe one day I’ll figure that out. But this is not a gender issue, it is a human issue. We all like to think of ourselves as self-made men or women. We’ve earned our own way. We’ve worked hard to have what we have. If there’s a problem, we’ll fix it without anyone else’s help!

The problem with this problem is that we can’t fix it! Even the law of God could not fix this problem (see verse 3). So we either ignore the problem or pretend we’ve fixed it. Those are the two basic responses of men and women to the human problems of sin and death. Some simply ignore the problem by filling their lives with stuff, noise and pleasure. They try to pretend the problem doesn’t exist and live accordingly. Others adopt one of the many religious or philosophical solutions to the problem. The creative ones even make up a solution of their own and then spend the rest of their lives pretending they’ve solved the twin problems of sin and death. The number of different religions testify to the desire of many people to solve this problem.

There’s a reason why we can’t solve this problem, even with the law of God. The problem is (look in the mirror). We’re the problem. The law is holy, just and good. There’s nothing wrong with the law. What’s wrong with “Thou shalt not kill” or “Thou shalt not steal” or “Thou shalt not bear false witness”? Nothing’s wrong with the law. The problem is that we cannot keep the law. Therefore, the law cannot deal with the problem of sin. The law can only say “That’s right.” or “That’s wrong.” It can never give the ability to do what is right or avoid what is wrong. In fact, it often does the opposite. When we’re told not to do something, there wells up deep inside us the desire to do the very thing which has been forbidden.

We have a big problem that we cannot solve. The solution has to come from somewhere outside of us.

3. God Has Solved Our Unsolvable Problem.
This is why the message of Christmas is so exciting. This is why God became man: to solve our unsolvable problem. Because you see, our greatest problem is also God’s greatest problem. How can He, who is holy, just and righteous, forgive we, who are unholy, unjust and unrighteous? As a holy God He absolutely must punish sin. If we question the integrity of a human judge who allows the guilty to go free, how much more unseemly would it be for the judge of all the earth to allow sin to go unpunished. For one sin to go unpunished in this universe would call into question the very existence of God. Because if the God of the Bible is not holy, He is not the God of the Bible and is therefore not God. But rest easy, God is God and He always punishes sin. But that is small comfort to us sinners. We need mercy, not justice. We want grace, not wrath. The good news is that God has orchestrated a way to forgive your sin while still remaining at the same time holy and just. But how is this possible?

It is possible because God has taken the initiative to do what we could not do. Listen to the words of Romans 8:3 again, “For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.” Remember the definition of “condemnation” stated earlier, ‘the punishment which follows sentencing in a judicial court.’ God fully ‘condemned,’ i.e. punished, sin on Christ on the cross. That is how you can be forgiven and God remain holy. This is how God can be both just and the justifier of those who have faith in Jesus. But not only is our sin punished, notice in verse 4 that the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in us! In verses 3 and 4 we have the great exchange described for us. Simply stated it is that Christ gets punished for our sins and we get rewarded for His righteousness. That’s a good deal, isn’t it? 2 Corinthians 5:21 says, “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.”

This is the biblical doctrine of justification. Sometimes this doctrine is difficult to understand, so let me explain it this way. Warren Wiersbe told the story of a man in England who put his Rolls-Royce on a boat and went across to the continent to go on a vacation. While he was driving around Europe, something happened to the motor of his car. He contacted the Rolls-Royce people back in England and asked, “I’m having trouble with my car; what do you suggest I do?” Well, the Rolls-Royce people flew a mechanic over! The mechanic repaired the car and flew back to England and left the man to continue his vacation.

As you can imagine, the fellow was wondering, “How much is this going to cost me?” So when he got back to England, he wrote the people a letter and asked how much he owed them. He received a letter from the office that read: “Dear Sir: There is no record anywhere in our files that anything ever went wrong with a Rolls-Royce.” That is justification!
W. Wiersbe, Key Words of the Christian Life, p. 16

God did this by “sending His own son” One person said, “If our greatest need had been information, God would have sent us an educator; If our greatest need had been technology, God would have sent us a scientist; If our greatest need had been money, God would have sent us an economist; If our greatest need had been pleasure, God would have sent us an entertainer; But our greatest need was forgiveness, so God sent us a Savior.”

But it wasn’t just that God sent His Son. He sent Him “in the likeness of sinful flesh.” Note that the text says, “in the likeness of sinful flesh” not “in sinful flesh.” If Christ were a sinner, then He could never have paid for our sins by His death on the cross. But Christ was just like us, except sinless. He had a real physical body, because He was to die in the place of sinful humans. This is Why God Became Man! To die in our place as a human and pay the penalty that we deserve. That is why Paul can begin chapter 8 with the glorious words, “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus.”

4. One Must Be In Christ to Receive the Benefits of God’s Solution to our Problem.
This solution to our problem is not applied to all men and women without distinction. This solution is only applied to those “in Christ.”

We all know the story of Noah and the ark found in Genesis 6-9. Let me use this story to illustrate what it means to be “in Christ.” When God poured out his wrath on the earth by means of the flood, Noah and his family were spared because they were inside the ark. To be “in Christ” is to be spared from God’s wrath. One day God will once again pour out His wrath on this earth. Your only hope is being in Christ. Are you in Christ? I didn’t ask if you were in a certain church or in a particular family, but are you in Christ?

Audio of this sermon as preached on December 14, 2003 is available online by clicking here.

The Righteousness Based on Faith (Exposition of Romans 10:5-13)

In this morning’s text the apostle Paul describes the righteousness based on faith by observing a contrast that must be observed, a content that must be believed and consequences that must be proclaimed!

For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them. (6) But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:) (7) Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.) (8) But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; (9) That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. (10) For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. (11) For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. (12) For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. (13) For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

I. A Contrast that Must Be Assumed, vv.5-8.
Paul has just made a definitive statement in verse 4 regarding Christ being the end of pursuing righteousness by the law for the one who believes. Now in verse 5, Paul briefly explains “the righteousness that is based on the law.” This righteousness consists in doing. It involves perfect and perpetual obedience to the law of God. Paul quotes from the law, from Leviticus 18:5, to make his point. The law itself says that life is only rewarded to those who do the commandments. The unstated assumption is that if one fails to do the commandments then death is the punishment. This curse of death for the one who fails to obey all the commandments is spelled out more directly in Deuteronomy 27:26 which says, “Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this law to do them.” If you’re going to receive “the righteousness that is based on the law” then you must completely and constantly obey that law. The problem with that is that if it were possible for us to start now, it would already be too late. We must look for righteousness elsewhere.

In verses 6-8, Paul paints a brilliant contrast to “the righteousness based on the law.” That a contrast is intended can be seen as Paul begins the next verse with the word “But…” What is contrasted? “The righteousness which is based on faith.” This contrast is also seen in Galatians 3:11-12 where Paul also quotes from Leviticus 18:5. There Paul says,

But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

These two terms (“the righteousness which is of the law” and “the righteousness which is of faith”) are also contrasted in Paul’s own testimony in Philippians 3:8-9,

Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:

The contrast is between an inaccessible and unreachable standard and a totally accessible and reachable Savior. On one hand you have the righteousness attained by human achievement, on the other hand you have righteousness that is received by divine accomplishment. The righteousness of the law is unattainable. But the righteousness of faith is accessible to all. One is impossible, the other is possible. One is unreachable, the other is attainable. This is the contrast between the righteousness that comes from the law and the righteousness that comes from faith.

Here in Romans 10:6-8, Paul illustrates “the righteousness which is of faith” by appealing to a text from the law: Deuteronomy 30:11-14. This text reads,

For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off. It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go up for us to heaven, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it? Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it? But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it.

The apostle Paul interacts with this text in an interesting way. He will quote a section then comment, quote another section and then comment again. He does this three times in these three verses. Each verse contains a quotation from Deuteronomy 30 and the apostle’s inspired commentary.

In the context of Deuteronomy 30, Moses is actually discussing God’s gracious giving of the law. He is magnifying the fact that God has spoken. He has revealed Himself to the children of Israel. Therefore there is no need for man to attempt the impossible of trying to go up to heaven or cross the sea to hear from God. God has come to them! What mercy and grace!

Paul takes that text of Scripture referring to the law and applies it to the gospel. He says that God has likewise spoken to us through Jesus Christ. Therefore there is no need to ascend to heaven, because Christ has already descended. There is no need to descend into the depths, because Christ has already risen from the dead. And just as accessible as the law was to the children of Israel in the wilderness, the gospel is made accessible to all who hear it, speak it and believe it. It is as close as your ears, mouth and heart!

This is how close the gospel is to you today! If you will hear and believe the message of the gospel you will be saved!!!

As Phillips Brooks wrote in the third verse of O Little Town of Bethlehem,

How silently, how silently, the wondrous Gift is giv’n;
So God imparts to human hearts the blessings of His Heav’n.
No ear may hear His coming, but in this world of sin,
Where meek souls will receive Him still, the dear Christ enters in.

II. A Content that Must Be Believed, vv.9-10.
But what is this “word of faith” which we preach that must be received? Paul spells out for us the barebone content of the gospel that must be believed in verses 9-10. First Paul speaks of two necessary components: confession with the mouth and belief in the heart. Although Paul at this point follows the order in the text quoted from Deuteronomy 30:14, it should not be assumed that confession with the mouth precedes belief in the heart. In fact, Paul quickly reverses the order back to the more expected in verse 10. But for the apostle Paul, confession with the mouth and belief in the heart are inseparable. They are linked together because as Jesus said in Matthew 12:34, “out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.” Therefore the confession with the mouth that does not include belief in the heart is a mere profession and will not save! Likewise, those who would think that they believe in their hearts but have not confessed Christ with their mouths do not possess saving faith.

So what is the content of our mouth’s confession and heart’s belief? We are to confess with our mouths that Jesus is Lord! This is the earliest confession of the church. What does it mean? It means to profess a belief in the deity of Jesus. That Jesus is God. The Greek word (kurios) translated “Lord” in this verse is used over 6,000 times in the LXX (the Greek translation of the Old Testament) to refer to Jehovah God. To say “Jesus is Lord” in the Roman Greek speaking world was to declare that Jesus is God! But it also had special significance to the Roman Christians to whom Paul is writing. In Rome lived the emperor and the religion of the day was emperor worship. Many Christians the first few centuries of the church were put to death for refusing to say, “Caesar is Lord.” Instead, they declared, “Jesus is Lord.” By the way, the same apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 12:3 that “no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.” This does not mean that no one can articulate with their lips the sounds forming the words of “Jesus is Lord.” It means they can not sincerely confess it with their lips from their hearts. Jesus said many will say to Him, “Lord, Lord.” But He will say, “Depart from me, ye workers of iniquity. I never knew thee” (Matt. 7:22-23). But not only must there be confession with the lips of the deity of Christ, there must also be a belief in the heart concerning the resurrection of Jesus. Why does Paul mention the resurrection without the death? Well, the death of Christ is obviously assumed in the resurrection, or else what was He resurrected from? But Paul points out the resurrection to show that Christianity is not about the death of a noble martyr, but the story of a living Savior! Hallelujah!!!

III. A Consequence that Must Be Proclaimed, vv. 11-13.
The consequences of this message of the gospel have already been mentioned in the previous verses (see vv. 9-10 “saved”, “justified” and “saved”). But in verses 11-13, Paul clearly spells out the implications of this salvation. He again quotes from the Old Testament. This time from Isaiah 28:16 (as in 9:33), “whosoever believes on him shall not be ashamed.” This Paul obviously takes to include Gentiles. This is Old Testament proof that salvation is now being offered to all people. By the way, we should not take this being “ashamed” as a psychological issue. Paul’s not saying that if you believe in Jesus you will neverbecome red faced again. This is not a psychological shame, but an eschatological shame! In other words, the one who believes on Jesus will not experience shame when he or she stands in the presence of Christ at the second coming.

Paul explains his application of this text in verse 12. Since “whosoever” or “everyone” who believes will not be put to shame, there is clearly no distinction between Jew and Greek since both have the same Lord who showers His riches on all who call on Him!

In verse 13, we have the conclusion. Again, Paul quotes from the Old Testament, this time from Joel 2:32. This same verse was used by Peter in his sermon on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2:21. It is interesting that the Hebrew of Joel 2:32 the LORD is YAHWEH (the personal name for God in the Old Testament). Here this same title is applied to Christ. Whoever calls on the name of the LORD who is God will be saved.

That this is a consequence that must be proclaimed is seen in the following verses (14-21). These verses will be dealt with in detail in a couple of weeks. But let me state now that Paul declares the importance of proclaiming this message as the only means of salvation for a lost and dying world!

Conclusion:
Have you believed this message? Call upon the name of the Lord! Cast yourself upon Jesus! Some of you saw the news story this week of a woman who tossed her one month old child from the third story of a burning building. The baby was caught by an amateur baseball player who was standing outside. Neither the mother or child were seriously injured after the fall of some 30 feet. “I said ‘God, please save my son,’” the mother was quoted as saying. “I prayed that someone would catch him and save his life.” Let me very blunt, you’re the one in the burning building. You must cast yourself to Jesus. The difference is that He has promised to catch you! If you call upon Him, He will save you!!!

Total Truth Study Guide Available for Free Online

Total Truth by Nancy Pearcey has just been rereleased in a second edition that includes a study guide. This 31 page study guide is now available for free download in .pdf format by clicking here. This is a great book and one can assume the additional study guide will only make it more useful. Not only was did Total Truth win the 2005 ECPA Gold Medallion Award for best book in the category of “Christianity and Society,” it also received a spot in the much more prestigious “The Ten Most Influential Books on My Life and Ministry (so far).” What are you waiting for? If you haven’t read this, you’re way behind! This is a must read!!!

Transcript of Mohler Debate on Deliberate Childlessness

Last night during the 11:00 pm (EST) hour of the Anderson Cooper 360° program on CNN, Dr. R. Albert Mohler (president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY) was involved in a debate with Madelyn Cain, author of The Childless Revolution: What It Means to be Childless Today (It was originally announced that the debate would be with Jennifer Shawne, she was instead featured in an interview in a segment that aired just prior to this debate.). The following is the rush transcript of the exchange between Dr. Mohler and Mrs. Cain which is available at CNN.com. To read the transcript of the entire hour which includes the previous segment mentioned above and by Dr. Mohler in this segment click here.
COLLINS: Some experts predict the number of married couples without children could go up 50 percent by the end of the decade. So what does it say about our future and ourselves? I’m joined now by two guests. From Louisville, Kentucky, we welcome Doctor Al Mohler, he is the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. And in Los Angeles, Madelyn Cain, she is the author of the book, “The Childless Revolution: What it means to be childless today”.

We welcome both of you.

Albert, why do you disagree with the child-free lifestyle?

ALBERT MOHLER, PRES., SO. BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: Well, in the first place I find it incredibly sad. I think most viewers watching that segment that you just very capably put forth, just demonstrates that this is really about avoiding the responsibilities of parenthood. And I find that profoundly sad.

You know, obviously, there is a tremendous moral point to be made here. These couples — well, they have to be very thankful that their parents didn’t make the same decision. And society depends upon parenthood and the raising of children being seen as a norm for married couples and as something that is of social value.

COLLINS: But, Albert, isn’t it — pardon the interruption. Isn’t it dangerous to assume that everyone can be a good parent?

MOHLER: Well, you know, I think what is more dangerous is to assume that we’re going to say that people can be adults, and be recognized as responsible adults, who don’t even aspire to grow up, to be mature enough to have children. I mean, parenthood is a part of helping to create adults. We grow up by having our children. Without that responsibility we have a generation of perpetual adolescents, just growing old. COLLINS: Madelyn, is he wrong?

MADELYN CAIN, AUTHOR, “THE CHIDLESS REVOLUTION”: I think he’s dead wrong. I think that parenting is an option, it is not an obligation. And I think that we should be applauding the people who are mature enough and making a decision saying I know that this is not the right choice for me. And that’s what these couples, that you were talking to tonight, were saying.

COLLINS: But is it possible that we are moving toward a more narcissistic society by choosing to sleep late and going to yoga, over having children?

CAIN: I think to try to lump all childless people together is a little bit dangerous, because unlike a woman who has had a child, there is only two groups of mothers; those who got pregnant, and those who just accidentally got there. The childless group is much more diverse. You have people who are childless by choice and some who cannot have children. And those who accidentally fall into childlessness and that’s where we’re moving.

COLLINS: Albert, are we grouping all of those people together?

MOHLER: Well, didn’t hear anyone in your segment who was having a fertility problem. That’s a separate issue. This is childlessness as a chosen lifestyle and that’s my big concern. Obviously, I respond to those who are having fertility issues with great sympathy.

But you know, what we’re hearing here are people who say I’m mature enough to know I’m too immature to be a parent. I’m going to let other people do that. I’m going to let other people do this. I mean, you look at some of these web sites, the references to children are just so dismissive and condescending and frankly, weird, that — I mean, obviously, if everyone in society even thought about this for an extended period of time, you know, we would not have any children. We have to understand that parenthood is to be understood as a part of marriage itself.

COLLINS: Madelyn –

CAIN: I don’t think –

(CROSS TALK)

COLLINS: Madelyn, the birth rate is going down. You heard the numbers as we came into the segment?

CAIN: Absolutely. The birth rate is going down, but those are choices that people are making. They also went down during the Depression. It is something that society is now in a position — women now are more educated than they ever they were. They’re in the workforce. They were never there before. We have effective birth control. I think that all children should be wanted children. Not children had out of obligation.

COLLINS: All right. To the both of you tonight, we appreciate your time. Albert Mohler and, our friend, from Los Angeles, Madelyn Cain. Thank you so much, the both of you.

CAIN: Thank you.

So, what do you think? Is intentional childlessness an ethical option or is it merely a sympton of our current narcissistic society?

Mohler on CNN Tonight at 11:00 pm (EST)

Dr. R. Albert Mohler, president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY, will be debating the topic of deliberate childlessness on tonight’s CNN news program “Anderson Cooper 360.” Dr. Mohler is scheduled to appear during the 11:00 pm (EST) hour. He will be debating Jennifer L. Shawne, author of Baby Not on Board.
Note: My family will not appear with Dr. Mohler tonight!

How to Get Rid of Your Enemies!

Do you have any enemies that you would like to get rid of? The apostle Paul tells us how in Romans 12:20 by quoting from Proverbs 25:22,

Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.

This passage has puzzled commentators through the ages. Great men of God have held different interpretations of this passage. Below is a summary of the three basic interpretations of this verse:

1. View of Divine Judgement: This view, which was held by the Early Church Father Chrysostom, states that Paul is suggesting that we do good to an enemy so that his final punishment will be more severe. A kind of reverse psychology judgment-style. As appealing as this interpretation might be to our own hearts, this interpretation does not fall in line with Paul’s general tone in the context. Paul is commanding us to overcome evil, by changing our enemies to friends. The very next verse says we are to “overcome evil with good.” Romans 12:21.

2. View of Meeting Needs: This view, expounded by Kenneth Wuest in his Word Studies in the Greek New Testament, is based on a common practice during Bible times in the Middle East. If a individual’s fire went out, they would go to a neighbor’s house to request live coals (as opposed to a cup of sugar) to rekindle their fire. Since burdens were often carried in a container balanced on the head at this time, this view sees the text as referring to the placing of live coals in a container on a neighbor’s head in answer to their need of fire for cooking and warmth. This somewhat fits the context of the passage by staying with the theme of showing kindness to your enemy by meeting his needs. However, when the grammar of the verse is considered, this too becomes an inadequate interpretation. The grammar of the verse points to the actions of feeding and giving to drink as producing the result of “heaping coals of fire on his head.”

3. View of Burning Shame: This view in my opinion has the most merit. It was held by Augustine, Jerome and Luther. Modern exponents of this view are John Stott and John MacArthur, Jr. Stated simply this view states that acts of kindness done to your enemy shame him and bring him to a place of repentance. Bible commentator James Denney wrote, “The meaning of ‘heaping burning coals on his head’ is hardly open to doubt. It must refer to the burning pain of shame and remorse which the man feels whose hostility is repaid by love. This is the only kind of vengeance the Christian is at liberty to contemplate.” Greek scholar A.T. Robertson wrote that the burning coals were a “metaphor for keen anguish.” St. Augustine said, “We should incite those who have hurt us to repentance by doing them good.” This view not only fits the grammar of the verse, but also corresponds to an ancient Egyptian custom. When a person wanted to demonstrate public contrition, he would carry on his head a pan of burning coals to represent the burning pain of his shame and guilt.

Conclusion
The above interpretation provides a dramatic picture of how God deals with man in goodness to lead him to repentance. As Romans 2:4 states, “knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?” Likewise, in the verse we have been examining, we are commanded to do good to our enemies to produce a state of repentance in them. Martin Luther comments, “God converts those whom He does convert by showing them goodness. It is only in this way that we can convert a person, namely, by showing him kindness and love.” Wasn’t this the very way that God responded to His enemies at Calvary? As commentator John Phillips has written,

The cross represents the greatest manifestation of the hatred in the heart of man toward God and at the same time the greatest manifestation of the love in the heart of God toward man. That very spear which pierced the Saviour’s side drew forth the blood that saves” (Phillips, John. Exploring Romans. p. 211).

So do you have enemies? Do you want to get rid of them? Try showing kindness to them! Then not only will you have gotten rid of an enemy, you will also have gained a friend!

Standing on the Shoulders of Giants

One of my favorite quotes is from Sir Isaac Newton, discoverer of the Law of Gravity. He said, “If I have seen farther, it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.” Newton saw farther than anyone had before, because he learned from those who had gone before him. Just imagine, if all anyone knew was the knowledge he accumulated on his own! There would be no electricity, no light bulb, no telephone, no computers, no cars, no airplanes, no space shuttles, etc. But because men learned from those who had gone before, these inventions and many more were possible. Sadly, many preachers like to work in a vacuum, gleaning nothing from the God-gifted men who have gone before them. God has especially equipped the Body of Christ with teachers, evangelist, and pastors. I thank God for men like Augustine, Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Newton, John Bunyan, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, and a host of others, who are, without a doubt, God’s gifts to the Church! By studying the writings of these gifted men, we are enabled to “stand on their shoulders.”
Ephesians 4:11-13 says,

[11] And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; [12] For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: [13] Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

I don’t think that what Paul said in Ephesians 4 applies only to those living in our generation with us today. Nor do I believe that it only applies to those in the same location. The church universal is much larger than our local congregation. It extends to all those saints, past and present, from east to west that have placed their hope in Christ and His sacrificial atonement alone! Therefore, the teachers, evangelists, and pastors from whom we have the privilege of learning stretch across the 2,000 years of church history (chronologically) and from pole to pole(geographically)!

Since we have been commanded by God to Rightly Divide the Word of Truth (II Timothy 2:15), this is a privilege we can’t afford to ignore! Great preachers of the past and present agree:

The 19th Century’s “Prince of Preachers”, Charles Haddon Spurgeon said,

In order to be able to expound the Scriptures, and as an aid to your pulpit studies, you will need to be familiar with the commentators: a glorious army, let me tell you, whose acquaintance will be your delight and profit. Of course, you are not such wiseacres as to think or say that you can expound Scripture without assistance from the works of divines and learned men who have labored before you in the field of exposition. . . . It seems odd, that certain men who talk so much of what the Holy Spirit reveals to themselves, should think so little of what he has revealed to others.

Warren Wiersbe, modern day expositor, has written similarly,

My books are my tools, and I use them. I cannot afford to be a book collector; neither the budget nor the diminishing shelf space . . . permits such a luxury…. I enjoy my library. Each book is a friend that converses with and teaches me. Better to have fewer of the best books than to clutter your shelves with volumes that cannot serve you well. Above all, love your books, use them, and dedicate all you learn to the service of Jesus Christ.

So, allow me to exhort you (not as one who has seen farther, but as one who is still trying to climb higher to view and worship the majesty of our Glorious God), study the Scriptures for they are the final revelation of God! However, don’t neglect to read the works of the God-gifted men from the past and present, for by climbing on their shoulders you may be able to see farther than you ever have before!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,020 other followers