Best (Favorite) Posts of the Week

Another week, another list! Here’s a look at my favorite posts from last week (besides mine of course). They are listed in no particular order, so don’t be jealous!

Oh yeah, one more thing I almost forgot. “So get to reading! and, Enjoy! Or Else!”

Missionary Story on the Big Screen

I received the following news release today and thought that some of you might be interested. “End of the Spear” is the story of the five missionaries (Nate Saint, Jim Elliot, Pete Fleming, Roger Youderian, and Ed McCully) who were speared to death by the Auca Indians of South America in January of 1956. This movie, which I have been anticipating for a couple of years, tells the story on the fiftieth anniversary of this historic event. This movie seems to focus on Steve Saint’s (son of Nate) version of the event (as opposed to Elizabeth Elliot’s well known account in Through Gates of Splendor). Anyway, here’s the news release I received today:

“END OF THE SPEAR” IN THEATERS
January 1956,
a culture on the brink of extinction
Saw the gospel lived
in men who were willing to die.

January 2006,
our culture will experience
the same story.

See “End Of The Spear” on opening weekend Friday, January 20th in USA and Canada theaters. A preview teaser can be viewed at www.endofthespear.com.

FOX HOME ENTERTAINMENT
We are pleased to announce Fox Home Entertainment has partnered with us and Every Tribe Entertainment to handle the home entertainment release of the documentary, Beyond the Gates of Splendor. The documentary releases in retail stores October 4th. FOX will also handle the home entertainment release of END OF THE SPEAR, following the theatrical release.

A Baptist Looks at the Lord’s Supper

The Lord’s Supper is one of the two ordinances given by Christ to the church. Since these ordinances are commands from Christ, the Lord of the church, they are not optional. As surely as all believers are commanded to be baptized, likewise all believers are commanded to partake of the Lord’s Supper. Unfortunately, some do not think this ordinance is as important as baptism. New Hampshire Confession of Faith (1833) comments on the Lord’’s Supper as the occassion ““in which the members of the Church, by the sacred use of bread and wine, are to commemorate together the dying love of Christ; preceded always by solemn self-examination.”” Similarly the Baptist Faith and Message (2000) declares: “The Lord’s Supper is a symbolic act of obedience whereby members of the church, through partaking of the bread and the fruit of the vine, memorialize the death of the Redeemer and anticipate His second coming.”

In 1 Corinthians 11:17-34, the apostle Paul confronts an abuse of the Lord’s Supper at the church of Corinth. Since most Bible scholars believe that 1 Corinthians was written prior to any of the Gospel accounts of the Lord’s Supper, this passage contains perhaps the earliest written account of Christ’s institution of the Lord’s Supper. The occasion of Paul’s writing of this account, however, is to correct abuses which were occurring in the administration of the Lord’s Supper at the church at Corinth.

Something about the way they were taking the Lord’s Supper is indicted by Paul as “unworthily” (v. 27). This was evidently serious business since Paul says that those who take the Lord’s Supper “unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord” (v. 27). The answer to how they were taking the Lord’s Supper “unworthily” seems to be found earlier in vv. 20-22. There the Apostle rebukes the Corinthians for not waiting for one another. Some were pigging out while others had nothing to eat. This goes against an important part of the symbolism of the Lord’s Supper which shows the church as one body in Christ. We are to take from the common loaf and cup in recognition of the fact that we are one body. Furthermore, the Corinthians seem to be guilty of taking the Lord’s Supper as if it were just another meal. In other words, they did not acknowledge the symbolic meaning of the elements (see v. 29).

An important distinction must be made between the two words ““unworthy”” and “unworthily”. The Apostle Paul uses the adverb ““unworthily” in this passage, not the adjective “unworthy”.” The reason this is so important is that none of us are worthy to take the Lord’s Supper. That is not the issue. The issue is how we take the Lord’s Supper: in a worthy or unworthy manner. In fact, one key way that an individual can take the Lord’s Supper “unworthily” is by not recognizing that he/she is “unworthy” and needful of the sacrifice of Christ depicted in the ordinance.

Is there a way that we as Twenty-First Century believers can take the Lord’s Supper “unworthily” or in an unworthy manner? I believe we can in the same two broad areas in which the Corinthians did: by failing to prefer others before ourselves and by taking the Lord’s Supper as if it were just another meal, without recognizing and meditating upon the significance of it. In other words, to observe the Lord’’s Supper worthily, we must remember that we observe the ordinance as a body and not as individuals, or rather as individuals within a body. Therefore, we must be in fellowship with one another when we take the Lord’s Supper. We also must prayerfully meditate upon what the symbols of the Lord’s Supper represent and take very seriously the meaning contained in the elements of the Lord’s Supper.

How then should we receive the Lord’s Supper? 1 Corinthians 11:26-28 gives an overview of four important looks that one should take before, during and after taking the Lord’s Supper:

  • The first is a backward look to the cross. The Lord’s Supper’s primary message is about remembering the cross of Christ and what was accomplished there for our sins. Any celebration of the Lord’s Supper with acknowledging the cause of its celebration causes one to become “guilty of the body and blood of the Lord” (v. 27). The purpose of the Lord’s Supper is, as v. 26 states, to “shew the Lord’s death till he come.”
  • Secondly, one must also take an inward look to examine one’s own heart and motives (v. 28). Are you considering what this Supper represents? Are you right with God and your brother? These matters must be dealt with properly before receiving the Lord’s Supper.
  • Thirdly, a forward look is needed. We must look forward to the Second Coming of Christ. Every celebration of the Lord’s Supper is an occasion to look forward to the day when we consummate this great feast with Jesus Christ Himself at the head of the table. ““For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’’s death till he come“” (v. 26).
  • Finally, a outward look to our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ is needed. Although the Lord’s Supper is intensely personal, there is an important corporate element to this ordinance as well. Failure to care for the needs of our brothers and sisters results in the same condemnation received by the Corinthians. To come to the Lord’s table without the attitude and action of humble, serving love for one another is a failure to properly “discern the Lord’s body.” As we remember how the physical body of Christ was broken for us, it is also important that we remember that we are a part of the spiritual body of Christ. Therefore, it matters whether or not we are in fellowship with one another when partaking of the Lord’s Supper.

I hope this short explanation is helpful as we seek to obey Christ’s command to “remember his death til he come”!

Book Recommendation: Engaging with God

Peterson, David. Engaging with God: A Biblical Theology of Worship. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992. 317 pp. $24.00.

Introduction
Engaging With God: A Biblical Theology of Worship was written by David Peterson. Peterson is the principal at Oak Hill College in London (Back Cover). He previously served as a lecturer at Moore Theological College in Sydney, Australia (Foreward), which is known for its penchant for Biblical theology. In this work, Peterson has produced a substantial contribution to the fields of both Biblical theology and worship. The development of a theology of worship using the methodology of Biblical theology is very helpful.

While writing in a clear style, Peterson’s target audience is clearly those who are responsible for leading the worship of the people of God. He combines sound exegesis with a view toward the practical application of the Scriptures. Beginning with the Old Testament and then progressively working his way through the pertinent literature in both testaments, Peterson has shown the development of the Hebrew concept of worship and its impact upon the A.D. first-century authors of the New Testament. Along the way, Peterson tests his hypothesis that “the worship of the living and true God is essentially an engagement with him on the terms that he proposes and in the way that he alone makes possible (20).

Argument
The heart of Engaging With God is the focus upon Jesus Christ as the fulfilment and replacement of the method of approaching God in the Old Covenant. Peterson makes this point repeatedly throughout his book, beginning in chapter three “Jesus and the New Temple” (80-107). Each chapter thereafter makes reference to the assertion of the centrality of Christ in worship. In the final chapter, Peterson states his main assertion in this way:

The gospel is the key to New Testament teaching about worship. The gospel declares to us the ultimate revelation of God in the person of Jesus Christ and the ultimate redemption in his sacrificial death. He fulfils and replaces the whole method of approach to God associated with the Sinai covenant (287-288).

The implication of this is that Tabernacle/Temple worship, the priesthood, sacrificial system all find their ultimate fulfilment in the person and work of Jesus Christ.

In the Old Testament, the tabernacle and later the temple were regarded as the meeting place between heaven and earth (81). However, in the gospels, Jesus Himself is seen to be the meeting place between heaven and earth. In Matthew 1:22-23, Isaiah 7:14 is quoted to refer to the birth of Jesus. In these passages, the baby is called “Immanuel, which means ‘God with us’.” Again in John 1:14, Jesus is referred to as the one who “dwelt among us,” which literally means “pitched his tent among us.” This was the same terminology used in the Old Testament to refer to the erection of the tabernacle (93). In both Matthew and John, Jesus is seen to be the ultimate fulfilment of the role of the tabernacle/temple as the meeting place between heaven and earth.

Another aspect in which Christ fulfilled the covenant of Sinai is in regard to its demand of perfect, perpetual obedience. All that the old covenant required concerning worship was fulfilled by Christ. The law said “Worship the LORD your God, and serve Him only” (Deut. 6:13). Peterson comments that “In one sense, the rest of the gospel narratives are an illustration of what it meant for Jesus to fulfil the ideal of Deuteronomy 6:13″ (110). Jesus has worshiped God in the way we are required to as His creatures, but that we fail to do as sinners.

This is not to say that the law has been annulled. It was merely fulfilled by Christ’s sinless life and substitutionary death. “The law was not abrogated or rejected by Jesus. It was transcended and fulfilled in his teaching and practice, ultimately in his death” (116). And again, “Jesus’ death not only served to replace the temple and its sacrificial system in the plan and purpose of God but also to re-establish the underlying covenant with Israel on a new basis” (123).

In the book of Acts, the sermons of the early church focused on Christ as the source of spiritual life. They also implied that Christ Himself was the new center of Christian worship. Peterson notes:

When the sermons in Acts proclaim the risen and glorified Jesus as the source of life and blessing for Israel and the nations, the implication is that he is to be the centre of true worship. As the focal point of God’s plans for Israel in the End-time, Christ fulfils and replaces the temple and the whole method of approach to God associated with it (136-137).

It is exactly this kind of teaching that resulted in the martyrdom of Stephen in Acts 7. The Jewish leaders were incensed that anyone would dare suggest that the Temple was not the ultimate place of true worship. Stephen’s preaching asserted that the risen and exalted Lord Jesus Christ was the ultimate locus for true worship. Stephen’s audience became so angry about this that they killed him. Peterson writes the following concerning Christ’s replacement of the temple:

The starting-point for Christian reflection on this matter appears to have been the conviction that God fully and finally manifested himself in the person of his Son. Jesus Christ is at the centre of New Testament thinking about worship. He is the ultimate meeting point between heaven and earth and the decisive means of reconciliation between God and humanity. He is the centre of salvation and blessing for all nations (285).

Conclusion
I agree with David Peterson’s basic argument in Engaging With God. I look forward to using this book in the years ahead as a reference for the exegesis of passages pertaining to worship in the Scriptures. I also agree with Peterson’s assessment of the application of his teaching. In his own words, “The most important practical consequence of all this is the need for Christian teaching and preaching to centre on the person and work of Jesus Christ” (102). “Preaching about Christ must be at the heart of a Christian theology of worship. As in the Old Testament, the word of the Lord is central to a genuine encounter with God” (144). Since the person and work of Christ has fulfilled all the teaching of the Old Testament regarding worship, we must preach Christ as that fulfilment and respond appropriately to His glory.

Two Polished Pennies: I Heard It on Good Authority

A friend, John Rush, has entered the blogsphere in a big way with an excellent post on truth and authority. Check out this post and stay tuned to his blog, I’m expecting great things from this guy!

Face Transplant: Any Recommendations?

The New York Times is reporting today that a new surgical procedure involving the transplant of a human face is now available. Does anyone have any recommendations about who should be first in line for this procedure? Seriously, this procedure could help many whose face has been disfigured in some way. To read the story of this fascinating procedure, click here. Hey, it’s in the New York Times so it has to be true!

Mark Dever Interview on Church Discipline

Justin Taylor posted the following yesterday on the Reformation 21 blog:

In today’s online edition of Christianity Today, Mark Dever is interviewed on the topic of church discipline.

You can also visit Dever’s website, 9Marks.org, and get his book, 9 Marks of a Healthy Church. Also watch for his new book, co-authored with Paul Alexander, The Deliberate Church: Building Your Ministry on the Gospel. It is an excellent book, due out in September from Crossway. If every pastor were to read and apply the principles in The Deliberate Church to their ministry, the evangelical landscape would be transformed.

A Couple of New Noteworthy Blogs

The Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals has launched a new blog. Here is a copy of their inaugural post:

Joe Carter at the blog Evangelical Outpost recent wrote:
I think that theologians need to take advantage of the Internet and especially the blogosphere to fulfill their role of “informing the laity.” Journals are an excellent way for them to stay up on current thought but it needs to trickle down into the pews.

We agree—which is one of the reasons the Alliance is launching the Reformation 21 Blog. Alliance Council members Ligon Duncan (Senior Pastor, First Presbyterian Church), Derek Thomas (John E. Richards Professor of Systematic and Practical Theology, Reformed Theological Seminary), Philip Ryken (Senior Minister of Tenth Presbyterian Church, Philadephia), Rick Phillips (Senior Minister, First Presbyterian Church in Coral Springs/Margate, Florida) and Carl Trueman (Associate Professor of Church History and Historical Theology, Westminster Theological Seminary) will be among the contributors. Bookmark and return often. We hope you enjoy the blog.

Also, Tom Ascol (executive director of Founder’s Minisitries) has launched a new blog. Here’s a copy of his inaugual post:

Our goal is to provide a forum for analyzing and discussing issues that relate to the work of biblical reformation in the churches throughout the Southern Baptist Convention and beyond. By “biblical reformation” we do not mean the promotion of a man, a system or a movement. We mean the ongoing re-formation of churches along biblical lines. A motto that arose out of the 16th century reformation recognizes this need. The reformers declared the need for “the church reformed, always reforming.” So it should be. Any church leader who does not see this need is simply naive. Another way to state it is that a church needs to be growing–always growing according to the Word of God. If the church growth movement had not so effectively co-opted such terminology we could just as readily use it. But today, “church growth” is measured almost exclusively in terms of numbers and statistics, a standard to which 2 Peter 3:18 will not submit.

So, with this introduction, feel free to read, enjoy, agree, disagree, comment or lurk.

-Tom Ascol, Executive Director of Founders Ministries

New Sermons Posted on sermonaudio.com

Yesterday I posted four new audio sermons in mp3 format on my sermonaudio.com website. Three of these sermons are from my current series in the book of Romans, the other is a message called “Christ’s Death as Redemption“. The links to the individual sermon pages are:
Each of these sermons are available for free mp3 download or streaming audio. There are a total of 33 sermons that I have preached on this site.

Best (Favorite) Posts of the Week

Let me point you in the direction of some of my favorite posts from last week:

So get to reading! and, Enjoy! Or Else!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,022 other followers